Human Sexuality and Diversity in The Renaissance Drama Essay

compassionate Sexuality and Diversity in The Renaissance Drama - Essay ExampleThere has been a prototype standard for workforce and women reflected in English Renaissance Drama and may be said to reverberate the social life of the age. Further, the growing importance of women in commercial and social spheres was examined in the drama, and Louis B. Wright concludes thatThis activity and governing body of women, especially women of the middle class, aroused the ire of conservatives who vented their displeasure in pulpit, and were answered by staunch defenders of the virtues of the criticized sex. unconstipated stage plays took up the cudgels.This divergence of opinion on the subject of women can be seen by cataloguing several(prenominal) of the satirists and defenders of the sex. the most famous detractors are the author of Schole house of women (about 1542) and attributed to Edward Gosenhill John Knox, The Monstrous Regiment of Women ( 1558) Philip Stubbes, The Anatomie of Abus es ( 1583) Stephen Gosson, Quippes for Upstart young Gentlewomen ( 1595) and Joseph Swetnam , The Araignment of Lewd, idle, froward and unconstant women ( 1615), as well as the anonymous author of Hic Mulier or the Man-Wo musical composition ( 1620). The attacks did not go unanswered. hence in the case of Sir doubting Thomas Elyot Defence of Good Women ( 1540), praise preceded attack. Other notable defenders of women were Edward More in The Defence of Women and Especially of Englyshe Women ( 1560) Nicholas Breton The approbation of Virtuous Ladies ( 1599) and Daniel Tuvil Asylum Veneris ( 1616). Finally women writers began to appear. ... Indeed in the case of Sir Thomas Elyot Defence of Good Women ( 1540), praise preceded attack. Other notable defenders of women were Edward More in The Defence of Women and Especially of Englyshe Women ( 1560) Nicholas Breton The Praise of Virtuous Ladies ( 1599) and Daniel Tuvil Asylum Veneris ( 1616). Finally women writers began to appear. The f irst is Rachel Speght, who in 1617, wrote A Mouzell for Melastomus, The Cynical Bayter of, and foule mouthed Barker against Evahs Sex, which was an attempt to mutism the notorious Swetnam, as well as the weighty biblical anti-feminism which, largely by interpretation, held that woman was outclassed to man. In a systematic effort to refute old arguments against women, Rachel Speght writes Secondly, the materiall cause, or matter whereof woman was made, was of a refined mould, if I may so speake for man was created of the dust of the earth, but woman was made of a part of man, after that he was a living soule yet was shee not produced from Adams foote, to be his low inferiour nor from his gaffer to be his superiour, but from his side, neare his heart, to be his equall that where he is Lord, she may be Lady and therefore saith God concerning man and woman jointly, Let them rule over the fish of the sea, & over the fowles of the Heaven, & over every beast that moueth upon the earth b y which words, he makes their authority equall, & all creatures to be in subjection unto them both. This being rightly considered, doth teach men to make such account of their wives, as Adam did of Eve, This is bone of my bone, & flesh of my flesh As also, that they uncomplete doe or with any more hurt unto them, then unto their owne bodies for men oughte to love their wives as themselves, because hee that loves